The Raoul Moat saga has gone on now seemingly for ages. The abysmal Police investigation and ineffective manhunt – which I blogged about on ConservativeHome – has now been joined by ever more serious questions over Raoul Moat’s death, and a bizarre polarisation of public mood.
In one corner is a wave of sympathy for Moat from very odd quarters. You’d expect grief from family and friends, and sympathy even from those who feel he was mentally ill and failed, but the 17,000+ people who’ve joined the “RIP Raoul Moat You Legend” Facebook group are neither. Instead they post anti-Police messages and call him a “legend”. He was no such thing!
In the other corner are those who are “glad he is dead” and largely blinkered to Police failings in the case, even the missed leads that risked losing Moat. On the Sky News Paper Review last night one guest, who’s name I forget, even advocated a “shoot on site” policy on the basis that’s what the US does (it isn’t – you have to give people chance to surrender or no one ever will).
Both groups are wrong.
It seems the ONLY two voices of reason are those closest to the case and with most to be angry about. Shot PC David Rathband who “bears no malice”, and Kelly Stobbart – sister to Sam, Moat’s former partner – who stated “I wish Raoul Moat was alive…I wanted to see him get sent to prison”.
Kelly Stobbart is right.
Whatever Raoul Moat did, however awful, we have a justice system for a reason. Often sentences are too soft, often there are errors, but our ancient system of innocence until proven guilty and trial by jury is what sets us apart from tyranny. Justice is delivered by the courts, not by the gun.
As Kelly Stobbart states, the Police had numerous opportunities to capture Moat and – in the final stand off – failed in their duty to deliver Moat to legal justice. The use of Tasers, sneaking up on Moat, and not using family members in negotiations, all contributed.
MJ Robbins has an excellent post – Seven Questions the Media must Answer